About
The industry changed shape. Most of the advice did not.
Hedge Fund Interview reports on where the jobs actually are now. The multi-manager platforms reorganised who does the hiring, what a seat is, and how it pays — and a great deal of what candidates read was written for the world before that.
Why the older guides mislead
A single-manager fund and a pod on a platform hire for different things, on different terms, with very different odds of the seat surviving a bad quarter. Advice written for one and applied to the other points candidates at the wrong preparation entirely.
It also sets the wrong expectations about the two things people most want to know: how long a seat tends to last, and what it actually pays once the payout formula and the drawdown rules are taken into account.
What we report
We keep the two models apart throughout: who runs hiring at each, what a pitch has to establish and in how long, how a book is funded and sized, what the risk limits mean in practice, and what happens to the seat in a drawdown. Where a firm has put none of that on the record, the article says as much instead of filling the gap.
Assets and seat counts are dated
Platform headcount, capital and team counts move constantly, and a stale number here would mislead about how big an employer somebody is. Every figure names its source and the day it held.
Two people, not one
Every citation gets opened a second time by an editor who had no hand in the draft, to confirm the page still supports the sentence resting on it. Updates get that second reading too.
Coverage is not for sale
None of the platforms, funds or recruiters written about here has any arrangement with us, commercial or otherwise. When a link leads to something paid, we say that in the same breath.
This publication is edited by Daniel Reeve — an editorial pen name. Hedge Fund Interview is operated by the company named in our Impressum.
Start with the guides.
Six in-depth guides on pod shops, recruiting, compensation, strategies and the interview.